Which is more profitable, Parker-Hannifin or RELX?

RELX keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Parker-Hannifin or RELX?

Parker-Hannifin grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Parker-Hannifin or RELX?

RELX costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Parker-Hannifin or RELX?

Parker-Hannifin would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Parker-HannifinPHvs

RELXRELX

Parker-Hannifin vs RELX stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Parker-Hannifin grows faster and has less debt. RELX is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits.

Side by side

	Parker-Hannifin	RELX
	$121 billion	$70.3 billion
	17.0%	21.5%
	+8.4%	+3.9%
	33.0×	25.8×
	1.4 years	2.1 years
	16.8%	22.0%
	0.9%	2.2%

Open Parker-Hannifin Open RELX

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Parker-Hannifin vs RTX · Parker-Hannifin vs SpaceX · Parker-Hannifin vs Trane Technologies · Parker-Hannifin vs United Rentals · RELX vs Quanta Services · RELX vs RTX · RELX vs SpaceX · RELX vs TransDigm Group