Which is more profitable, Parker-Hannifin or Trane Technologies?

Parker-Hannifin keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Parker-Hannifin or Trane Technologies?

Trane Technologies grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Parker-Hannifin or Trane Technologies?

Trane Technologies costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Parker-Hannifin or Trane Technologies?

Trane Technologies would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Parker-HannifinPHvs

Trane TechnologiesTT

Parker-Hannifin vs Trane Technologies stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Parker-Hannifin is more profitable. Trane Technologies grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.

Side by side

	Parker-Hannifin	Trane Technologies
	$121 billion	$91.5 billion
	17.0%	13.7%
	+8.4%	+11.4%
	33.0×	31.3×
	1.4 years	0.7 years
	16.8%	24.0%
	0.9%	0.9%

Open Parker-Hannifin Open Trane Technologies

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Parker-Hannifin vs United Rentals · Parker-Hannifin vs Ametek · Parker-Hannifin vs Caterpillar · Parker-Hannifin vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City · Trane Technologies vs Quanta Services · Trane Technologies vs RELX · Trane Technologies vs RTX · Trane Technologies vs SpaceX