Northrop Grumman vs RELX stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Northrop Grumman is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. RELX is more profitable and grows faster.
Side by side
| Northrop Grumman | RELX | |
|---|---|---|
| $78.2 billion | $70.3 billion | |
| 10.0% | 21.5% | |
| +2.7% | +3.9% | |
| 18.7× | 25.8× | |
| 1.8 years | 2.1 years | |
| 13.8% | 22.0% | |
| 1.7% | 2.2% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Northrop Grumman vs RTX · Northrop Grumman vs SpaceX · Northrop Grumman vs Trane Technologies · Northrop Grumman vs Caterpillar · RELX vs Norfolk Southern · RELX vs Parker-Hannifin · RELX vs Quanta Services · RELX vs RTX

