Garmin vs Northrop Grumman stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Garmin is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. Northrop Grumman is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Garmin | Northrop Grumman | |
|---|---|---|
| $54.5 billion | $78.2 billion | |
| 23.0% | 10.0% | |
| +11.6% | +2.7% | |
| 32.8× | 18.7× | |
| Net cash | 1.8 years | |
| 16.6% | 13.8% | |
| 1.5% | 1.7% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Garmin vs L3Harris Technologies · Northrop Grumman vs L3Harris Technologies · Northrop Grumman vs RELX · Northrop Grumman vs RTX · Northrop Grumman vs SpaceX

