Hilton Worldwide Holdings vs Las Vegas Sands stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Las Vegas Sands is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Hilton Worldwide Holdings | Las Vegas Sands | |
|---|---|---|
| $83.0 billion | $25.3 billion | |
| 12.1% | 12.5% | |
| +22.8% | +34.7% | |
| 57.0× | 15.6× | |
| 4.2 years | 2.6 years | |
| 28.3% | 15.7% | |
| 0.2% | 2.2% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Hilton Worldwide Holdings vs Marriott International · Hilton Worldwide Holdings vs McDonald's · Hilton Worldwide Holdings vs MercadoLibre · Hilton Worldwide Holdings vs Nike · Las Vegas Sands vs Marriott International