Which is better, HWM or TT?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) currently grades higher than TT — 66/100 (B grade) vs 67/100 (B). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — HWM wins on Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, and Charlie Munger; TT wins on Warren Buffett and Joel Greenblatt. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy HWM or TT?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both HWM and TT are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is HWM better than TT for value investing?

The two are close on the headline Buffett-Fit score (66/100 vs 67/100), so "better for value investing" depends on which pillar you weight most. The five Buffett pillars + six other frameworks are broken down side-by-side on this page so you can pick the one that fits your style.

What's the difference between HWM and TT on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). HWM currently scores 66/100 (B grade); TT scores 67/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, HWM or TT?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. HWM and TT are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, HWM or TT?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are HWM and TT both Industrials stocks?

Yes — both Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) and Trane Technologies plc (TT) operate in the Industrials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this HWM vs TT comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Howmet Aerospace

Trane Technologies

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

HWM

Howmet Aerospace

Market cap

$102.65B

Sector

Industrials

Trane Technologies

Market cap

$99.7B

Sector

Industrials

Overall winner

Howmet Aerospace HWM

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	HWM	TT	Winner
Warren Buffett	66B	67B	TT
Benjamin Graham	88A	77B	HWM
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	HWM	TT
Market cap	$102.65B	$99.7B
P/E (TTM)	59.9x	35.9x
EV/EBIT	50.0x	26.9x
ROIC (TTM)	17.3%	19.62%
Gross margin	32.56%	35.92%
Net margin	20.22%	13.42%
Revenue CAGR 5y	13.5%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

HWM leads on

EPS CAGR 5y57.9%vs 21.74%+62%
Net margin20.22%vs 13.42%+34%
Revenue CAGR 5y13.5%vs 10.82%+20%

TT leads on

More like HWM

HWM vs PAYX HWM vs LII HWM vs GGG HWM vs WTS HWM vs OMAB HWM vs NSSC

More like TT

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.