Which is more profitable, Lockheed Martin or Trane Technologies?

Trane Technologies keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Lockheed Martin or Trane Technologies?

Trane Technologies grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Lockheed Martin or Trane Technologies?

Lockheed Martin costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Lockheed Martin or Trane Technologies?

Trane Technologies would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Lockheed MartinLMTvs

Trane TechnologiesTT

Lockheed Martin vs Trane Technologies stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Lockheed Martin is cheaper for its profits. Trane Technologies is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt.

Side by side

	Lockheed Martin	Trane Technologies
	$138 billion	$91.5 billion
	6.7%	13.7%
	+2.8%	+11.4%
	27.4×	31.3×
	2.0 years	0.7 years
	20.1%	24.0%
	2.5%	0.9%

Open Lockheed Martin Open Trane Technologies

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Lockheed Martin vs United Parcel Service · Lockheed Martin vs Caterpillar · Lockheed Martin vs Cintas · Lockheed Martin vs Fastenal · Trane Technologies vs 3M · Trane Technologies vs Northrop Grumman · Trane Technologies vs Norfolk Southern · Trane Technologies vs Parker-Hannifin