Which is more profitable, 3M or Trane Technologies?

Trane Technologies keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, 3M or Trane Technologies?

Trane Technologies grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, 3M or Trane Technologies?

3M costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, 3M or Trane Technologies?

Trane Technologies would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

3MMMMvs

Trane TechnologiesTT

3M vs Trane Technologies stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

3M is cheaper for its profits. Trane Technologies is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt.

Side by side

	3M	Trane Technologies
	$94.9 billion	$91.5 billion
	13.0%	13.7%
	−5.0%	+11.4%
	29.2×	31.3×
	1.1 years	0.7 years
	24.1%	24.0%
	2.0%	0.9%

Open 3M Open Trane Technologies

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: 3M vs Boston Scientific · 3M vs Cintas · 3M vs Fastenal · 3M vs RELX · Trane Technologies vs Northrop Grumman · Trane Technologies vs Norfolk Southern · Trane Technologies vs Parker-Hannifin · Trane Technologies vs Quanta Services