Which is more profitable, KLA or Snowflake?

KLA keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, KLA or Snowflake?

Snowflake grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, KLA or Snowflake?

KLA costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, KLA or Snowflake?

Snowflake would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

KLAKLACvs

SnowflakeSNOW

KLA vs Snowflake stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

KLA is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits. Snowflake grows faster and has less debt.

Side by side

	KLA	Snowflake
	$198 billion	$103 billion
	35.6%	-28.4%
	+14.4%	+51.2%
	41.1×	No profit yet
	0.7 years	Net cash
	38.2%	-22.6%
	0.4%	–

Open KLA Open Snowflake

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: KLA vs Synopsys · KLA vs Sony · KLA vs Seagate Technology Holdings · KLA vs TE Connectivity · Snowflake vs Lam Research · Snowflake vs Microsoft · Snowflake vs Nvidia · Snowflake vs Palo Alto Networks