Which is more profitable, Palo Alto Networks or Texas Instruments?

Texas Instruments keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Palo Alto Networks or Texas Instruments?

Palo Alto Networks grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Palo Alto Networks or Texas Instruments?

Texas Instruments costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Palo Alto Networks or Texas Instruments?

Palo Alto Networks would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Palo Alto NetworksPANWvs

Texas InstrumentsTXN

Palo Alto Networks vs Texas Instruments stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Palo Alto Networks grows faster and has less debt. Texas Instruments is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits.

Side by side

	Palo Alto Networks	Texas Instruments
	$264 billion	$277 billion
	12.3%	28.3%
	+22.0%	+4.1%
	232.7×	55.5×
	Net cash	1.3 years
	15.9%	16.7%
	–	1.8%

Open Palo Alto Networks Open Texas Instruments

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Palo Alto Networks vs Apple · Palo Alto Networks vs Adobe · Palo Alto Networks vs Analog Devices · Palo Alto Networks vs Applied Materials · Texas Instruments vs TSMC · Texas Instruments vs Apple · Texas Instruments vs Adobe · Texas Instruments vs Applied Materials