Which is more profitable, Adobe or KLA?

KLA keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Adobe or KLA?

KLA grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Adobe or KLA?

Adobe costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Adobe or KLA?

Adobe would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

AdobeADBEvs

KLAKLAC

Adobe vs KLA stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Adobe is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. KLA is more profitable and grows faster.

Side by side

	Adobe	KLA
	$94.6 billion	$198 billion
	30.0%	35.6%
	+13.1%	+14.4%
	13.3×	41.1×
	0.1 years	0.7 years
	39.9%	38.2%
	–	0.4%

Open Adobe Open KLA

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Adobe vs Lumentum Holdings · Adobe vs Lam Research · Adobe vs Monolithic Power Systems · Adobe vs Marvell Technology · KLA vs Analog Devices · KLA vs Applied Materials · KLA vs AMD · KLA vs Arista Networks