Adobe vs Uber stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Adobe is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Uber grows faster.
Side by side
| Adobe | Uber | |
|---|---|---|
| $94.6 billion | $142 billion | |
| 30.0% | 19.3% | |
| +13.1% | +36.1% | |
| 13.3× | 14.2× | |
| 0.1 years | 0.7 years | |
| 39.9% | 12.9% | |
| – | – |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Adobe vs Western Digital · Adobe vs Apple · Adobe vs Accenture · Adobe vs Analog Devices · Uber vs Applied Materials · Uber vs Arista Networks · Uber vs Broadcom · Uber vs Cadence Design Systems

