Which is better, AEM or SUZ?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) currently grades higher than SUZ — 67/100 (C grade) vs 39/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — AEM wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; SUZ wins on none. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy AEM or SUZ?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both AEM and SUZ are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is AEM better than SUZ for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, AEM currently grades higher — 67/100 vs 39/100, a 28-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between AEM and SUZ on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). AEM currently scores 67/100 (C grade); SUZ scores 39/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, AEM or SUZ?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. AEM and SUZ are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, AEM or SUZ?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are AEM and SUZ both Basic Materials stocks?

Yes — both Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Suzano S.A. (SUZ) operate in the Basic Materials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this AEM vs SUZ comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited

Suzano

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

AEM

Market cap

$88.14B

Sector

Materials

SUZ

Suzano

Market cap

$10.39B

Sector

Materials

Overall winner

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited AEM

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	AEM	SUZ	Winner
Warren Buffett	67C	39D	AEM
Benjamin Graham	72B	38D	AEM
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	AEM	SUZ
Market cap	$88.14B	$10.39B
P/E (TTM)	16.9x	4.5x
EV/EBIT	13.8x	12.2x
ROIC (TTM)	15.16%	4.31%
Gross margin	61.33%	30.8%
Net margin	39.47%	22.98%
Revenue CAGR 5y	32.74%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

AEM leads on

Debt / Equity0.0xvs 2.0x+99%
Market cap$88.14Bvs $10.39B+88%
Revenue CAGR 5y32.74%vs 4.65%+86%
ROIC (TTM)15.16%vs 4.31%

More like AEM

AEM vs RGLD AEM vs WDFC AEM vs WPM AEM vs NEU AEM vs CF AEM vs GFI

More like SUZ

SUZ vs RGLD

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.