Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Zoom Communications
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$343.12B
Sector
Technology
ZM
Zoom Communications
Market cap
$31.14B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | ZM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 55C | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 72B | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 57C | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 50C | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 53C | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 53C | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 53D | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | ZM |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $343.12B | $31.14B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 16.0x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 25.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 8.82% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 77.02% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 39.03% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 4.39% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 8.03% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.0x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$343.12Bvs $31.14B+91%
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs 8.82%+59%
- Revenue CAGR 5y5.31%vs 4.39%+17%
ZM leads on
- Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.3x+98%
- P/E (TTM)16.0xvs 40.0x+60%
- EV/EBIT25.8xvs 41.0x+37%
- Gross margin77.02%vs 48.96%+36%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.