Which is better, AMCX or HACK.ST?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Hacksaw AB (HACK.ST) currently grades higher than AMCX — 79/100 (B grade) vs 33/100 (F). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — AMCX wins on none; HACK.ST wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy AMCX or HACK.ST?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both AMCX and HACK.ST are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is AMCX better than HACK.ST for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, HACK.ST currently grades higher — 79/100 vs 33/100, a 46-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between AMCX and HACK.ST on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). AMCX currently scores 33/100 (F grade); HACK.ST scores 79/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, AMCX or HACK.ST?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. AMCX and HACK.ST are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, AMCX or HACK.ST?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are AMCX and HACK.ST both Communication Services stocks?

Yes — both AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX) and Hacksaw AB (HACK.ST) operate in the Communication Services sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this AMCX vs HACK.ST comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

AMC Networks

AMCX$489.64MCommunication Services Market cap, Sector

Hacksaw AB

HACK.ST$21.37BCommunication Services Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Hacksaw AB

AMCX 07 HACK.ST

Fit scores by strategy

AMCX0wins

7winsHACK.ST

Warren Buffett

33F

B79

Benjamin Graham

22F

B84

Philip Fisher

17F

A97

Peter Lynch

14F

B78

Joel Greenblatt

31F

A91

Charlie Munger

27F

A90

Terry Smith

22F

A100

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	AMCX	HACK.ST
Market cap	$489.64M	$21.37B Winner
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 7.0x	167.4x
EV/EBIT	Winner: 12.5x	145.8x
ROIC (TTM)

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

AMCX leads on

P/E (TTM)7.0xvs 167.4x+96%
EV/EBIT12.5xvs 145.8x+91%

HACK.ST leads on

EPS CAGR 5y115.8%vs -23.67%+120%
Revenue CAGR 5y83.46%vs -6.9%+108%

More like AMCX

AMCX vs 2371.T AMCX vs 603444.SS AMCX vs 3293.TWO AMCX vs 002517.SZ

More like HACK.ST

HACK.ST vs 2371.T HACK.ST vs 603444.SS

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Industries

Rankings

Glossary

Tools & Methodology

AMC Networks

Hacksaw AB

Fit scores by strategy

Side-by-side metrics

Where each one wins

More like AMCX

More like HACK.ST

Related on invest-like

Key terms in this analysis