Which is better, AME or GGG?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Graco Inc. (GGG) currently grades higher than AME — 62/100 (C grade) vs 55/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — AME wins on Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, and Joel Greenblatt; GGG wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy AME or GGG?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both AME and GGG are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is AME better than GGG for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, GGG currently grades higher — 62/100 vs 55/100, a 7-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between AME and GGG on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). AME currently scores 55/100 (C grade); GGG scores 62/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, AME or GGG?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. AME and GGG are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, AME or GGG?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are AME and GGG both Industrials stocks?

Yes — both AMETEK, Inc. (AME) and Graco Inc. (GGG) operate in the Industrials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this AME vs GGG comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

AMETEK

Graco

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

AME

AMETEK

Market cap

$52.31B

Sector

Industrials

GGG

Graco

Market cap

$12.83B

Sector

Industrials

Overall winner

Graco GGG

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	AME	GGG	Winner
Warren Buffett	55C	62C	GGG
Benjamin Graham	67B	70B	GGG
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	AME	GGG
Market cap	$52.31B	$12.83B
P/E (TTM)	34.2x	24.8x
EV/EBIT	27.9x	19.9x
ROIC (TTM)	11.15%	16.96%
Gross margin	36.56%	52.31%
Net margin	20.11%	22.96%
Revenue CAGR 5y	7.48%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

AME leads on

Market cap$52.31Bvs $12.83B+75%
Revenue CAGR 5y7.48%vs 2.99%+60%
EPS CAGR 5y10.6%vs 4.93%+53%

GGG leads on

More like AME

AME vs PAYX AME vs LII AME vs WTS AME vs OMAB AME vs NSSC AME vs FAST

More like GGG

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.