Which is better, AMH or CLDT?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) currently grades higher than CLDT — 55/100 (D grade) vs 51/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — AMH wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; CLDT wins on Joel Greenblatt. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy AMH or CLDT?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both AMH and CLDT are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is AMH better than CLDT for value investing?

The two are close on the headline Buffett-Fit score (55/100 vs 51/100), so "better for value investing" depends on which pillar you weight most. The five Buffett pillars + six other frameworks are broken down side-by-side on this page so you can pick the one that fits your style.

What's the difference between AMH and CLDT on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). AMH currently scores 55/100 (D grade); CLDT scores 51/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, AMH or CLDT?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. AMH and CLDT are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, AMH or CLDT?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are AMH and CLDT both Real Estate stocks?

Yes — both American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) operate in the Real Estate sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this AMH vs CLDT comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

American Homes 4 Rent

AMH$14.2BReal Estate Market cap, Sector

Chatham Lodging

CLDT$617.92MReal Estate Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

American Homes 4 Rent

AMH 6 CLDT

Fit scores by strategy

AMH6wins

1winsCLDT

Warren Buffett

55D

D51

Benjamin Graham

44F

F31

Philip Fisher

60C

F42

Peter Lynch

52D

F32

Joel Greenblatt

46D

B71

Charlie Munger

49D

F38

Terry Smith

47D

F41

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	AMH	CLDT
Market cap	Winner: $14.2B	$617.92M
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 23.7x	52.7x
EV/EBIT	35.8x	35.1x Winner
ROIC (TTM)

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

AMH leads on

ROIC (TTM)3.65%vs -6.53%+101%
Market cap$14.2Bvs $617.92M+96%
Net margin25.19%vs 3.13%+88%
P/E (TTM)23.7xvs 52.7x+55%

CLDT leads on

More like AMH

AMH vs GLPI AMH vs DOC AMH vs AAT AMH vs EPRT

More like CLDT

CLDT vs GLPI CLDT vs DOC

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Industries

Rankings

Glossary

Tools & Methodology

American Homes 4 Rent

Chatham Lodging

Fit scores by strategy

Side-by-side metrics

Where each one wins

More like AMH

More like CLDT

Related on invest-like

Key terms in this analysis