Which is better, ASR or OMAB?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. (OMAB) currently grades higher than ASR — 69/100 (B grade) vs 61/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — ASR wins on Benjamin Graham, Peter Lynch, and Joel Greenblatt; OMAB wins on Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy ASR or OMAB?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both ASR and OMAB are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is ASR better than OMAB for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, OMAB currently grades higher — 69/100 vs 61/100, a 8-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between ASR and OMAB on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). ASR currently scores 61/100 (C grade); OMAB scores 69/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, ASR or OMAB?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. ASR and OMAB are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, ASR or OMAB?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are ASR and OMAB both Industrials stocks?

Yes — both Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V. (ASR) and Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. (OMAB) operate in the Industrials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this ASR vs OMAB comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V.

Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

ASR

Market cap

$9.06B

Sector

Industrials

OMAB

Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.

Market cap

$4.98B

Sector

Industrials

Overall winner

Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. OMAB

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	ASR	OMAB	Winner
Warren Buffett	61C	69B	OMAB
Benjamin Graham	78B	66B	ASR
Philip Fisher	61C	71B	OMAB
Peter Lynch	56C	55C	ASR
Joel Greenblatt	36D	30F	ASR
Charlie Munger	65B	70B	OMAB
Terry Smith	54C	70B	OMAB

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	ASR	OMAB
Market cap	$9.06B	$4.98B
P/E (TTM)	14.7x	16.2x
EV/EBIT	10.5x	10.7x
ROIC (TTM)	14.54%	10.34%
Gross margin	46.57%	69.04%
Net margin	28.17%	32.63%
Revenue CAGR 5y	18.66%	16.32%
EPS CAGR 5y	15.06%	16.57%
Debt / Equity	0.9x	1.1x
Dividend yield	15.59%	5.18%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

ASR leads on

Dividend yield15.59%vs 5.18%+67%
Market cap$9.06Bvs $4.98B+45%
ROIC (TTM)14.54%vs 10.34%+29%
Debt / Equity0.9xvs 1.1x+17%

OMAB leads on

Gross margin69.04%vs 46.57%+33%
Net margin32.63%vs 28.17%+14%
EPS CAGR 5y16.57%vs 15.06%+9%

More like ASR

ASR vs 6532.T ASR vs RAA.DE ASR vs CTAS ASR vs FAST ASR vs RELX ASR vs REL.L

More like OMAB

OMAB vs 6532.T OMAB vs RAA.DE OMAB vs CTAS OMAB vs FAST OMAB vs RELX OMAB vs REL.L

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for ASR Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for OMAB

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Strategy

ASR

OMAB

Warren Buffett

61C

69B

Benjamin Graham

78B

66B

Philip Fisher

61C

71B

Peter Lynch

56C

55C

Joel Greenblatt

36D

30F

Charlie Munger

65B

70B

Terry Smith

54C

70B

Metric

ASR

OMAB

Market cap

$9.06B

$4.98B

P/E (TTM)

14.7x

16.2x

EV/EBIT

10.5x

10.7x

ROIC (TTM)

14.54%

10.34%

Gross margin

46.57%

69.04%

Net margin

28.17%

32.63%

Revenue CAGR 5y

18.66%

16.32%

EPS CAGR 5y

15.06%

16.57%

Debt / Equity

0.9x

1.1x

Dividend yield

15.59%

5.18%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

ASR leads on

Dividend yield15.59%vs 5.18%+67%
Market cap$9.06Bvs $4.98B+45%
ROIC (TTM)14.54%vs 10.34%+29%
Debt / Equity0.9xvs 1.1x+17%

OMAB leads on

Gross margin69.04%vs 46.57%+33%
Net margin32.63%vs 28.17%+14%
EPS CAGR 5y16.57%vs 15.06%+9%