Which is better, ATEN or FICO?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) currently grades higher than ATEN — 85/100 (A grade) vs 75/100 (B). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — ATEN wins on Benjamin Graham; FICO wins on Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy ATEN or FICO?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both ATEN and FICO are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is ATEN better than FICO for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, FICO currently grades higher — 85/100 vs 75/100, a 10-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between ATEN and FICO on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). ATEN currently scores 75/100 (B grade); FICO scores 85/100 (A grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, ATEN or FICO?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. ATEN and FICO are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, ATEN or FICO?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are ATEN and FICO both Technology stocks?

Yes — both A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) operate in the Technology sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this ATEN vs FICO comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

A10 Networks

ATEN$2.06BTechnology Market cap, Sector

Fair Isaac

FICO$28.53BTechnology Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Fair Isaac

ATEN 16 FICO

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

ATEN1wins

6winsFICO

Warren Buffett

75B

A85

Benjamin Graham

92A

A88

Philip Fisher

58D

A85

Peter Lynch

27F

B70

Joel Greenblatt

52D

A94

Charlie Munger

74B

A91

Terry Smith

70B

A95

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	ATEN	FICO
Market cap	$2.06B	$28.53B Winner
P/E (TTM)	43.9x	33.8x Winner
EV/EBIT	45.2x	30.9x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	8.15%	53.2% Winner
Gross margin	79.5%	84.16% Winner
Net margin	14.9%	33.67% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	3.83%	10.89% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	-17.13%	18.48% Winner
Debt / Equity	1.0x	- Winner
Dividend yield	Winner: 0.88%	0.0%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

ATEN leads on

Dividend yield0.88%vs 0.0%+100%

FICO leads on

EPS CAGR 5y18.48%vs -17.13%+193%
Debt / Equity-vs 1.0x+157%
Market cap$28.53Bvs $2.06B+93%
ROIC (TTM)53.2%vs 8.15%+85%

More like ATEN

ATEN vs CAMS.BO ATEN vs FTNT ATEN vs KLAC ATEN vs 4071.T

More like FICO

FICO vs CAMS.BO FICO vs FTNT FICO vs KLAC FICO vs 4071.T

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for ATEN Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for FICO

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

A10 Networks

ATEN$2.06BTechnology Market cap, Sector

Fair Isaac

FICO$28.53BTechnology Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Fair Isaac

ATEN 16 FICO

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

ATEN1wins

6winsFICO

Warren Buffett

75B

A85

Benjamin Graham

92A

A88

Philip Fisher

58D

A85

Peter Lynch

27F

B70

Joel Greenblatt

52D

A94

Charlie Munger

74B

A91

Terry Smith

70B

A95

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	ATEN	FICO
Market cap	$2.06B	$28.53B Winner
P/E (TTM)	43.9x	33.8x Winner
EV/EBIT	45.2x	30.9x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	8.15%	53.2% Winner
Gross margin	79.5%	84.16% Winner
Net margin	14.9%	33.67% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	3.83%	10.89% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	-17.13%	18.48% Winner
Debt / Equity	1.0x	- Winner
Dividend yield	Winner: 0.88%	0.0%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

ATEN leads on

Dividend yield0.88%vs 0.0%+100%

FICO leads on

EPS CAGR 5y18.48%vs -17.13%+193%
Debt / Equity-vs 1.0x+157%
Market cap$28.53Bvs $2.06B+93%
ROIC (TTM)53.2%vs 8.15%+85%

More like ATEN

ATEN vs CAMS.BO ATEN vs FTNT ATEN vs KLAC ATEN vs 4071.T

More like FICO

FICO vs CAMS.BO FICO vs FTNT FICO vs KLAC FICO vs 4071.T

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for ATEN Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for FICO

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.