Which is better, AZA.ST or TASE.TA?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, The Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange Ltd. (TASE.TA) currently grades higher than AZA.ST — 71/100 (B grade) vs 58/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — AZA.ST wins on Terry Smith; TASE.TA wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, and Charlie Munger. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy AZA.ST or TASE.TA?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both AZA.ST and TASE.TA are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is AZA.ST better than TASE.TA for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, TASE.TA currently grades higher — 71/100 vs 58/100, a 13-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between AZA.ST and TASE.TA on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). AZA.ST currently scores 58/100 (C grade); TASE.TA scores 71/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, AZA.ST or TASE.TA?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. AZA.ST and TASE.TA are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, AZA.ST or TASE.TA?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are AZA.ST and TASE.TA both Financial Services stocks?

Yes — both Avanza Bank Holding AB (publ) (AZA.ST) and The Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange Ltd. (TASE.TA) operate in the Financial Services sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this AZA.ST vs TASE.TA comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Avanza Bank Holding AB (publ)

AZA.ST$61.35BFinancials Market cap, Sector

The Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange

TASE.TA$11.77BFinancials Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

The Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange

AZA.ST 16 TASE.TA

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

AZA.ST1wins

6winsTASE.TA

Warren Buffett

58D

B71

Benjamin Graham

64C

B80

Philip Fisher

65C

A86

Peter Lynch

48D

B70

Joel Greenblatt

34F

C66

Charlie Munger

68C

B71

Terry Smith

78B

B76

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	AZA.ST	TASE.TA
Market cap	Winner: $61.35B	$11.77B
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 21.1x	75.3x
EV/EBIT	-	54.9x
ROIC (TTM)	-	23.5%
Gross margin	-	57.18%
Net margin	Winner: 58.56%	32.12%
Revenue CAGR 5y	14.76%	16.0% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	16.06%	57.51% Winner
Debt / Equity	Winner: 0.0x	0.2x
Dividend yield	-	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

AZA.ST leads on

Market cap$61.35Bvs $11.77B+81%
Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.2x+80%
P/E (TTM)21.1xvs 75.3x+72%
Net margin58.56%vs 32.12%+45%

TASE.TA leads on

EPS CAGR 5y57.51%vs 16.06%+72%
Revenue CAGR 5y16.0%vs 14.76%+8%

More like AZA.ST

AZA.ST vs IBKD.SI AZA.ST vs FBK.MI AZA.ST vs CPI.JO AZA.ST vs RILBA.CO

More like TASE.TA

TASE.TA vs IBKD.SI TASE.TA vs FBK.MI TASE.TA vs CPI.JO TASE.TA vs RILBA.CO

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for AZA.ST Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for TASE.TA

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Avanza Bank Holding AB (publ)

AZA.ST$61.35BFinancials Market cap, Sector

The Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange

TASE.TA$11.77BFinancials Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

The Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange

AZA.ST 16 TASE.TA

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

AZA.ST1wins

6winsTASE.TA

Warren Buffett

58D

B71

Benjamin Graham

64C

B80

Philip Fisher

65C

A86

Peter Lynch

48D

B70

Joel Greenblatt

34F

C66

Charlie Munger

68C

B71

Terry Smith

78B

B76

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	AZA.ST	TASE.TA
Market cap	Winner: $61.35B	$11.77B
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 21.1x	75.3x
EV/EBIT	-	54.9x
ROIC (TTM)	-	23.5%
Gross margin	-	57.18%
Net margin	Winner: 58.56%	32.12%
Revenue CAGR 5y	14.76%	16.0% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	16.06%	57.51% Winner
Debt / Equity	Winner: 0.0x	0.2x
Dividend yield	-	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

AZA.ST leads on

Market cap$61.35Bvs $11.77B+81%
Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.2x+80%
P/E (TTM)21.1xvs 75.3x+72%
Net margin58.56%vs 32.12%+45%

TASE.TA leads on

EPS CAGR 5y57.51%vs 16.06%+72%
Revenue CAGR 5y16.0%vs 14.76%+8%

More like AZA.ST

AZA.ST vs IBKD.SI AZA.ST vs FBK.MI AZA.ST vs CPI.JO AZA.ST vs RILBA.CO

More like TASE.TA

TASE.TA vs IBKD.SI TASE.TA vs FBK.MI TASE.TA vs CPI.JO TASE.TA vs RILBA.CO

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for AZA.ST Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for TASE.TA

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.