Which is better, BFC or HLNE?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) currently grades higher than BFC — 76/100 (C grade) vs 51/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — BFC wins on Peter Lynch; HLNE wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy BFC or HLNE?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both BFC and HLNE are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is BFC better than HLNE for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, HLNE currently grades higher — 76/100 vs 51/100, a 25-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between BFC and HLNE on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). BFC currently scores 51/100 (C grade); HLNE scores 76/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, BFC or HLNE?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. BFC and HLNE are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, BFC or HLNE?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are BFC and HLNE both Financial Services stocks?

Yes — both Bank First Corporation (BFC) and Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) operate in the Financial Services sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this BFC vs HLNE comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Bank First

Hamilton Lane

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

BFC

Bank First

Market cap

$1.58B

Sector

Financials

HLNE

Hamilton Lane

Market cap

$5.02B

Sector

Financials

Overall winner

Hamilton Lane HLNE

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	BFC	HLNE	Winner
Warren Buffett	51C	76C	HLNE
Benjamin Graham	50C	65B	HLNE
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	BFC	HLNE
Market cap	$1.58B	$5.02B
P/E (TTM)	22.5x	14.1x
EV/EBIT	15.6x	15.7x
ROIC (TTM)	1.21%	14.52%
Gross margin	72.46%	69.23%
Net margin	27.71%	30.59%
Revenue CAGR 5y	19.79%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

BFC leads on

Debt / Equity0.2xvs 0.4x+63%

HLNE leads on

ROIC (TTM)14.52%vs 1.21%+92%
EPS CAGR 5y17.91%vs 5.12%+71%

More like BFC

BFC vs MA BFC vs SLDE BFC vs KNSL BFC vs SPGI BFC vs EVR BFC vs MCO

More like HLNE

HLNE vs MA

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.