Which is better, BSM or FANG?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) currently grades higher than FANG — 76/100 (B grade) vs 57/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — BSM wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; FANG wins on none. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy BSM or FANG?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both BSM and FANG are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is BSM better than FANG for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, BSM currently grades higher — 76/100 vs 57/100, a 19-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between BSM and FANG on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). BSM currently scores 76/100 (B grade); FANG scores 57/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, BSM or FANG?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. BSM and FANG are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, BSM or FANG?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are BSM and FANG both Energy stocks?

Yes — both Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) operate in the Energy sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this BSM vs FANG comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Black Stone Minerals, L.P.

Diamondback Energy

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

BSM

Market cap

$2.95B

Sector

Energy

FANG

Diamondback Energy

Market cap

$57.48B

Sector

Energy

Overall winner

Black Stone Minerals, L.P. BSM

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	BSM	FANG	Winner
Warren Buffett	76B	57C	BSM
Benjamin Graham	64C	53C	BSM
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	BSM	FANG
Market cap	$2.95B	$57.48B
P/E (TTM)	9.6x	140.5x
EV/EBIT	11.6x	14.2x
ROIC (TTM)	27.66%	5.09%
Gross margin	78.01%	41.83%
Net margin	63.48%	2.65%
Revenue CAGR 5y	-4.41%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

BSM leads on

EPS CAGR 5y13.55%vs -17.47%+178%
Net margin63.48%vs 2.65%+96%
P/E (TTM)9.6xvs 140.5x+93%
ROIC (TTM)27.66%vs 5.09%

More like BSM

BSM vs TPL BSM vs KRP BSM vs USAC BSM vs MGY BSM vs NRP BSM vs EOG

More like FANG

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.