Which is better, BWXT or CTAS?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Cintas Corporation (CTAS) currently grades higher than BWXT — 77/100 (B grade) vs 53/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — BWXT wins on Benjamin Graham; CTAS wins on Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy BWXT or CTAS?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both BWXT and CTAS are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is BWXT better than CTAS for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, CTAS currently grades higher — 77/100 vs 53/100, a 24-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between BWXT and CTAS on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). BWXT currently scores 53/100 (C grade); CTAS scores 77/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, BWXT or CTAS?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. BWXT and CTAS are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, BWXT or CTAS?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are BWXT and CTAS both Industrials stocks?

Yes — both BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS) operate in the Industrials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this BWXT vs CTAS comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

BWX Technologies

Cintas

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

BWXT

BWX Technologies

Market cap

$18.51B

Sector

Industrials

CTAS

Cintas

Market cap

$68.94B

Sector

Industrials

Overall winner

Cintas CTAS

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	BWXT	CTAS	Winner
Warren Buffett	53C	77B	CTAS
Benjamin Graham	85A	84A	BWXT
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	BWXT	CTAS
Market cap	$18.51B	$68.94B
P/E (TTM)	53.7x	34.9x
EV/EBIT	61.9x	29.7x
ROIC (TTM)	8.05%	23.17%
Gross margin	22.63%	50.36%
Net margin	10.21%	17.57%
Revenue CAGR 5y	10.77%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

BWXT leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y10.77%vs 9.79%+9%

CTAS leads on

EPS CAGR 5y14.24%vs 2.67%+81%
Market cap$68.94Bvs $18.51B+73%

More like BWXT

BWXT vs FAST BWXT vs RELX BWXT vs OMAB BWXT vs TT BWXT vs CSW BWXT vs HEI

More like CTAS

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.