Which is better, BWXT or CTAS?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Cintas Corporation (CTAS) currently grades higher than BWXT — 77/100 (B grade) vs 53/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — BWXT wins on Benjamin Graham; CTAS wins on Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy BWXT or CTAS?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both BWXT and CTAS are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is BWXT better than CTAS for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, CTAS currently grades higher — 77/100 vs 53/100, a 24-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between BWXT and CTAS on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). BWXT currently scores 53/100 (C grade); CTAS scores 77/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, BWXT or CTAS?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. BWXT and CTAS are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, BWXT or CTAS?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are BWXT and CTAS both Industrials stocks?

Yes — both BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS) operate in the Industrials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this BWXT vs CTAS comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

BWX Technologies

BWXT$18.51BIndustrials Market cap, Sector

Cintas

CTAS$68.94BIndustrials Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Cintas

BWXT 16 CTAS

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

BWXT1wins

6winsCTAS

Warren Buffett

53D

B77

Benjamin Graham

85A

B84

Philip Fisher

41F

B72

Peter Lynch

55D

C68

Joel Greenblatt

45D

C69

Charlie Munger

52D

B80

Terry Smith

47D

B75

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	BWXT	CTAS
Market cap	$18.51B	$68.94B Winner
P/E (TTM)	53.7x	34.9x Winner
EV/EBIT	61.9x	29.7x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	8.05%	23.17% Winner
Gross margin	22.63%	50.36% Winner
Net margin	10.21%	17.57% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 10.77%	9.79%
EPS CAGR 5y	2.67%	14.24% Winner
Debt / Equity	1.6x	0.6x Winner
Dividend yield	0.51%	1.07% Winner

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

BWXT leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y10.77%vs 9.79%+9%

CTAS leads on

EPS CAGR 5y14.24%vs 2.67%+81%
Market cap$68.94Bvs $18.51B+73%
ROIC (TTM)23.17%vs 8.05%+65%
Debt / Equity0.6xvs 1.6x+61%

More like BWXT

BWXT vs 6532.T BWXT vs SALIK.AE BWXT vs GPP.WA BWXT vs MYCR.ST

More like CTAS

CTAS vs 6532.T CTAS vs SALIK.AE CTAS vs GPP.WA CTAS vs MYCR.ST

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for BWXT Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for CTAS

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

BWX Technologies

BWXT$18.51BIndustrials Market cap, Sector

Cintas

CTAS$68.94BIndustrials Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Cintas

BWXT 16 CTAS

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

BWXT1wins

6winsCTAS

Warren Buffett

53D

B77

Benjamin Graham

85A

B84

Philip Fisher

41F

B72

Peter Lynch

55D

C68

Joel Greenblatt

45D

C69

Charlie Munger

52D

B80

Terry Smith

47D

B75

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	BWXT	CTAS
Market cap	$18.51B	$68.94B Winner
P/E (TTM)	53.7x	34.9x Winner
EV/EBIT	61.9x	29.7x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	8.05%	23.17% Winner
Gross margin	22.63%	50.36% Winner
Net margin	10.21%	17.57% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 10.77%	9.79%
EPS CAGR 5y	2.67%	14.24% Winner
Debt / Equity	1.6x	0.6x Winner
Dividend yield	0.51%	1.07% Winner

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

BWXT leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y10.77%vs 9.79%+9%

CTAS leads on

EPS CAGR 5y14.24%vs 2.67%+81%
Market cap$68.94Bvs $18.51B+73%
ROIC (TTM)23.17%vs 8.05%+65%
Debt / Equity0.6xvs 1.6x+61%

More like BWXT

BWXT vs 6532.T BWXT vs SALIK.AE BWXT vs GPP.WA BWXT vs MYCR.ST

More like CTAS

CTAS vs 6532.T CTAS vs SALIK.AE CTAS vs GPP.WA CTAS vs MYCR.ST

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for BWXT Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for CTAS

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.