Stock comparison
Cadence Design Systems
OppFi
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
OPFI
OppFi
Market cap
$695.95M
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CDNS | OPFI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 52C | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 55D | CDNS |
| Philip Fisher | 84A | 52C | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 78B | 44D | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 67B | OPFI |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 64D | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 80A | 58C | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CDNS | OPFI |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $103.04B | $695.95M |
| P/E (TTM) | 80.7x | 3.8x |
| EV/EBIT | 59.1x | 5.3x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 12.19% | 148.72% |
| Gross margin | 88.85% | 98.11% |
| Net margin | 21.18% | 10.86% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.38% | 14.24% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.65% | -15.37% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.5x | 4.0x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CDNS leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y12.65%vs -15.37%+182%
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $695.95M+99%
- Debt / Equity0.5xvs 4.0x+88%
- Net margin21.18%vs 10.86%+49%
OPFI leads on
- P/E (TTM)3.8xvs 80.7x+95%
- ROIC (TTM)148.72%vs 12.19%+92%
- EV/EBIT5.3xvs 59.1x+91%
- Gross margin98.11%vs 88.85%+9%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.