Which is more profitable, Cadence Design Systems or Seagate Technology Holdings?

Seagate Technology Holdings keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Cadence Design Systems or Seagate Technology Holdings?

Cadence Design Systems grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Cadence Design Systems or Seagate Technology Holdings?

Seagate Technology Holdings costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Cadence Design Systems or Seagate Technology Holdings?

Cadence Design Systems would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Cadence Design SystemsCDNSvs

Seagate Technology HoldingsSTX

Cadence Design Systems vs Seagate Technology Holdings stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Cadence Design Systems grows faster and has less debt. Seagate Technology Holdings is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits.

Side by side

	Cadence Design Systems	Seagate Technology Holdings
	$88.6 billion	$121 billion
	20.9%	26.1%
	+14.6%	+2.7%
	79.9×	38.1×
	Net cash	0.4 years
	16.4%	53.4%
	–	0.3%

Open Cadence Design Systems Open Seagate Technology Holdings

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Cadence Design Systems vs TE Connectivity · Cadence Design Systems vs TSMC · Cadence Design Systems vs Texas Instruments · Cadence Design Systems vs Uber · Seagate Technology Holdings vs Fortinet · Seagate Technology Holdings vs Intuit · Seagate Technology Holdings vs KLA · Seagate Technology Holdings vs Lam Research