Which is better, CF or SOLS?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) currently grades higher than SOLS — 64/100 (C grade) vs 42/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — CF wins on Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; SOLS wins on Benjamin Graham. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy CF or SOLS?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both CF and SOLS are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is CF better than SOLS for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, CF currently grades higher — 64/100 vs 42/100, a 22-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between CF and SOLS on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). CF currently scores 64/100 (C grade); SOLS scores 42/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, CF or SOLS?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. CF and SOLS are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, CF or SOLS?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are CF and SOLS both Basic Materials stocks?

Yes — both CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) and Solstice Advanced Materials Inc. (SOLS) operate in the Basic Materials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this CF vs SOLS comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

CF Industries Holdings

Solstice Advanced Materials

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Market cap

$18.7B

Sector

Materials

SOLS

Solstice Advanced Materials

Market cap

$12.98B

Sector

Materials

Overall winner

CF Industries Holdings CF

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	CF	SOLS	Winner
Warren Buffett	64C	42D	CF
Benjamin Graham	72B	81A	SOLS
Philip Fisher

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CF	SOLS
Market cap	$18.7B	$12.98B
P/E (TTM)	10.9x	65.5x
EV/EBIT	8.8x	20.9x
ROIC (TTM)	15.41%	7.19%
Gross margin	40.41%	31.31%
Net margin	23.73%	5.28%
Revenue CAGR 5y	2.03%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CF leads on

EPS CAGR 5y20.46%vs -30.92%+166%
Dividend yield1.61%vs 0.09%+95%
P/E (TTM)10.9xvs 65.5x+83%
Net margin23.73%vs 5.28%

More like CF

CF vs RGLD CF vs WDFC CF vs AEM CF vs WPM CF vs NEU CF vs GFI

More like SOLS

SOLS vs RGLD

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.