Which is better, CHT or TKC?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (CHT) currently grades higher than TKC — 58/100 (C grade) vs 38/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — CHT wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; TKC wins on Philip Fisher. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy CHT or TKC?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both CHT and TKC are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is CHT better than TKC for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, CHT currently grades higher — 58/100 vs 38/100, a 20-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between CHT and TKC on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). CHT currently scores 58/100 (C grade); TKC scores 38/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, CHT or TKC?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. CHT and TKC are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, CHT or TKC?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are CHT and TKC both Communication Services stocks?

Yes — both Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (CHT) and Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. (TKC) operate in the Communication Services sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this CHT vs TKC comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Chunghwa Telecom

Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

CHT

Chunghwa Telecom

Market cap

$33.88B

Sector

Communication Services

TKC

Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.

Market cap

$5.08B

Sector

Communication Services

Overall winner

Chunghwa Telecom CHT

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	CHT	TKC	Winner
Warren Buffett	58C	38D	CHT
Benjamin Graham	70B	38D	CHT
Philip Fisher	42D	44D	TKC
Peter Lynch	56C	46D	CHT
Joel Greenblatt	43D	19F	CHT
Charlie Munger	42D	29F	CHT
Terry Smith	42D	29F	CHT

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CHT	TKC
Market cap	$33.88B	$5.08B
P/E (TTM)	27.9x	12.9x
EV/EBIT	22.0x	335.7x
ROIC (TTM)	8.58%	4.14%
Gross margin	35.78%	27.89%
Net margin	16.41%	7.03%
Revenue CAGR 5y	3.04%	-51.31%
EPS CAGR 5y	2.0%	40.38%
Debt / Equity	0.1x	0.7x
Dividend yield	3.64%	3.32%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CHT leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y3.04%vs -51.31%+106%
EV/EBIT22.0xvs 335.7x+93%
Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.7x+86%
Market cap$33.88Bvs $5.08B+85%

TKC leads on

EPS CAGR 5y40.38%vs 2.0%+95%
P/E (TTM)12.9xvs 27.9x+54%

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Chunghwa Telecom

Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.

Fit scores by strategy

Side-by-side metrics

Where each one wins

More like CHT

More like TKC

Related on invest-like

Key terms in this analysis