Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Cellebrite DI
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$343.12B
Sector
Technology
CLBT
Cellebrite DI
Market cap
$3.29B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | CLBT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 48D | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 62D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 60C | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 34F | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 51C | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 49D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 50D | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | CLBT |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $343.12B | $3.29B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 44.5x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 47.7x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 10.02% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 84.2% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 16.47% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 17.89% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | -10.56% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.0x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y7.72%vs -10.56%+173%
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$343.12Bvs $3.29B+99%
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs 10.02%+54%
CLBT leads on
- Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.3x+83%
- Revenue CAGR 5y17.89%vs 5.31%+70%
- Gross margin84.2%vs 48.96%+42%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.