Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Celestica
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$339.94B
Sector
Technology
CLS
Celestica
Market cap
$39.84B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | CLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 52C | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 76B | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 55C | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 55C | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 69C | CLS |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 44D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 38D | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | CLS |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $339.94B | $39.84B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 43.6x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 38.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 29.23% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 11.61% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 6.95% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 22.3% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 73.03% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.4x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$339.94Bvs $39.84B+88%
- Net margin29.31%vs 6.95%+76%
- Gross margin48.96%vs 11.61%+76%
CLS leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y73.03%vs 7.72%+89%
- Revenue CAGR 5y22.3%vs 5.31%+76%
- ROIC (TTM)29.23%vs 21.6%+26%
- EV/EBIT38.8xvs 41.0x+5%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.