Stock comparison
CMS Energy
CMS$22.4BUtilities Market cap, Sector
KPI Green Energy Limited
KPIGREEN.NS$80.34BUtilities Market cap, Sector
Overall winner
KPI Green Energy Limited
CMS 16 KPIGREEN.NS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
Fit scores by strategy
CMS1wins
6winsKPIGREEN.NS
43F
C65
58D
C65
33F
B73
27F
C66
39F
F32
41F
C69
26F
D56
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CMS | KPIGREEN.NS |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $22.4B | $80.34B Winner |
| P/E (TTM) | 19.5x | 15.8x Winner |
| EV/EBIT | 23.7x | 14.5x Winner |
| ROIC (TTM) | 3.56% | 7.96% Winner |
| Gross margin | Winner: 64.61% | 47.58% |
| Net margin | 12.55% | 17.66% Winner |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 3.89% | 61.18% Winner |
| EPS CAGR 5y | -6.71% | 54.65% Winner |
| Debt / Equity | 2.0x | 1.7x Winner |
| Dividend yield | 3.11% | - |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CMS leads on
- Gross margin64.61%vs 47.58%+26%
KPIGREEN.NS leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y54.65%vs -6.71%+112%
- Revenue CAGR 5y61.18%vs 3.89%+94%
- Market cap$80.34Bvs $22.4B+72%
- ROIC (TTM)7.96%vs 3.56%+55%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.