Which is better, CPK or KPIGREEN.NS?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, KPI Green Energy Limited (KPIGREEN.NS) currently grades higher than CPK — 65/100 (C grade) vs 43/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — CPK wins on none; KPIGREEN.NS wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy CPK or KPIGREEN.NS?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both CPK and KPIGREEN.NS are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is CPK better than KPIGREEN.NS for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, KPIGREEN.NS currently grades higher — 65/100 vs 43/100, a 22-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between CPK and KPIGREEN.NS on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). CPK currently scores 43/100 (D grade); KPIGREEN.NS scores 65/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, CPK or KPIGREEN.NS?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. CPK and KPIGREEN.NS are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, CPK or KPIGREEN.NS?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are CPK and KPIGREEN.NS both Utilities stocks?

Yes — both Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) and KPI Green Energy Limited (KPIGREEN.NS) operate in the Utilities sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this CPK vs KPIGREEN.NS comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Chesapeake Utilities

CPK$3.17BUtilities Market cap, Sector

KPI Green Energy Limited

KPIGREEN.NS$80.34BUtilities Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

KPI Green Energy Limited

CPK 07 KPIGREEN.NS

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

CPK0wins

7winsKPIGREEN.NS

Warren Buffett

43F

C65

Benjamin Graham

45D

C65

Philip Fisher

41F

B73

Peter Lynch

60C

C66

Joel Greenblatt

28F

F32

Charlie Munger

41F

C69

Terry Smith

26F

D56

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CPK	KPIGREEN.NS
Market cap	$3.17B	$80.34B Winner
P/E (TTM)	20.2x	15.8x Winner
EV/EBIT	18.2x	14.5x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	5.04%	7.96% Winner
Gross margin	38.16%	47.58% Winner
Net margin	15.1%	17.66% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	13.02%	61.18% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	6.01%	54.65% Winner
Debt / Equity	Winner: 1.0x	1.7x
Dividend yield	2.18%	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CPK leads on

Debt / Equity1.0xvs 1.7x+41%

KPIGREEN.NS leads on

Market cap$80.34Bvs $3.17B+96%
EPS CAGR 5y54.65%vs 6.01%+89%
Revenue CAGR 5y61.18%vs 13.02%+79%
ROIC (TTM)7.96%vs 5.04%+37%

More like CPK

CPK vs RGSI.TO CPK vs ALUP3.SA CPK vs TTW.BK CPK vs IG.MI

More like KPIGREEN.NS

KPIGREEN.NS vs RGSI.TO KPIGREEN.NS vs ALUP3.SA KPIGREEN.NS vs TTW.BK KPIGREEN.NS vs IG.MI

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for CPK Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for KPIGREEN.NS

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Chesapeake Utilities

CPK$3.17BUtilities Market cap, Sector

KPI Green Energy Limited

KPIGREEN.NS$80.34BUtilities Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

KPI Green Energy Limited

CPK 07 KPIGREEN.NS

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

CPK0wins

7winsKPIGREEN.NS

Warren Buffett

43F

C65

Benjamin Graham

45D

C65

Philip Fisher

41F

B73

Peter Lynch

60C

C66

Joel Greenblatt

28F

F32

Charlie Munger

41F

C69

Terry Smith

26F

D56

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CPK	KPIGREEN.NS
Market cap	$3.17B	$80.34B Winner
P/E (TTM)	20.2x	15.8x Winner
EV/EBIT	18.2x	14.5x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	5.04%	7.96% Winner
Gross margin	38.16%	47.58% Winner
Net margin	15.1%	17.66% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	13.02%	61.18% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	6.01%	54.65% Winner
Debt / Equity	Winner: 1.0x	1.7x
Dividend yield	2.18%	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CPK leads on

Debt / Equity1.0xvs 1.7x+41%

KPIGREEN.NS leads on

Market cap$80.34Bvs $3.17B+96%
EPS CAGR 5y54.65%vs 6.01%+89%
Revenue CAGR 5y61.18%vs 13.02%+79%
ROIC (TTM)7.96%vs 5.04%+37%

More like CPK

CPK vs RGSI.TO CPK vs ALUP3.SA CPK vs TTW.BK CPK vs IG.MI

More like KPIGREEN.NS

KPIGREEN.NS vs RGSI.TO KPIGREEN.NS vs ALUP3.SA KPIGREEN.NS vs TTW.BK KPIGREEN.NS vs IG.MI

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for CPK Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for KPIGREEN.NS

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.