Stock comparison
California Resources
Hess Midstream LP
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CRC
California Resources
Market cap
$5.51B
Sector
Energy
HESM
Hess Midstream LP
Market cap
$8.41B
Sector
Energy
Overall winner
Hess Midstream LP HESM
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CRC | HESM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 55C | 69C | HESM |
| Benjamin Graham | 45D | 73B | HESM |
| Philip Fisher | 44D | 69C | HESM |
| Peter Lynch | 15F | 54C | HESM |
| Joel Greenblatt | 15F | 42D | HESM |
| Charlie Munger | 49D | 77C | HESM |
| Terry Smith | 48D | 74C | HESM |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CRC | HESM |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $5.51B | $8.41B |
| P/E (TTM) | - | 13.7x |
| EV/EBIT | 7.8x | 11.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 12.79% | 20.59% |
| Gross margin | 37.83% | 69.45% |
| Net margin | -13.09% | 22.65% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 8.87% | 7.73% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | -13.53% | 12.21% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.5x | 10.1x |
| Dividend yield | 2.66% | 7.74% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CRC leads on
- P/E (TTM)-vs 13.7x+183%
- Debt / Equity0.5xvs 10.1x+95%
- EV/EBIT7.8xvs 11.8x+34%
- Revenue CAGR 5y8.87%vs 7.73%+13%
HESM leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y12.21%vs -13.53%+190%
- Net margin22.65%vs -13.09%+158%
- Dividend yield7.74%vs 2.66%+66%
- Gross margin69.45%vs 37.83%+46%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.