Which is better, CSU.TO or FTNT?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) currently grades higher than CSU.TO — 83/100 (A grade) vs 44/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — CSU.TO wins on Benjamin Graham; FTNT wins on Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy CSU.TO or FTNT?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both CSU.TO and FTNT are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is CSU.TO better than FTNT for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, FTNT currently grades higher — 83/100 vs 44/100, a 39-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between CSU.TO and FTNT on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). CSU.TO currently scores 44/100 (D grade); FTNT scores 83/100 (A grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, CSU.TO or FTNT?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. CSU.TO and FTNT are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, CSU.TO or FTNT?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are CSU.TO and FTNT both Technology stocks?

Yes — both Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) and Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) operate in the Technology sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this CSU.TO vs FTNT comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Constellation Software

CSU.TO$56.52BTechnology Market cap, Sector

Fortinet

FTNT$111.63BTechnology Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Fortinet

CSU.TO 16 FTNT

Fit scores by strategy

CSU.TO1wins

6winsFTNT

Warren Buffett

44F

B83

Benjamin Graham

76B

B73

Philip Fisher

43F

A97

Peter Lynch

33F

B77

Joel Greenblatt

45D

B78

Charlie Munger

42F

B82

Terry Smith

36F

A88

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CSU.TO	FTNT
Market cap	$56.52B	$111.63B Winner
P/E (TTM)	127.1x	51.8x Winner
EV/EBIT	56.7x	47.4x Winner
ROIC (TTM)

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CSU.TO leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y20.63%vs 19.43%+6%

FTNT leads on

EPS CAGR 5y34.75%vs 0.0%+100%
Net margin27.49%vs 4.41%+84%
ROIC (TTM)33.92%vs 9.38%+72%

More like CSU.TO

CSU.TO vs FICO CSU.TO vs CAMS.BO CSU.TO vs TNE.AX CSU.TO vs 1523.HK

More like FTNT

FTNT vs FICO FTNT vs CAMS.BO

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Industries

Rankings

Glossary

Tools & Methodology

Constellation Software

Fortinet

Fit scores by strategy

Side-by-side metrics

Where each one wins

More like CSU.TO

More like FTNT

Related on invest-like

Key terms in this analysis