Which is better, CSW or JBTM?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, CSW Industrials, Inc. (CSW) currently grades higher than JBTM — 68/100 (B grade) vs 36/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — CSW wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; JBTM wins on Peter Lynch. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy CSW or JBTM?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both CSW and JBTM are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is CSW better than JBTM for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, CSW currently grades higher — 68/100 vs 36/100, a 32-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between CSW and JBTM on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). CSW currently scores 68/100 (B grade); JBTM scores 36/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, CSW or JBTM?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. CSW and JBTM are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, CSW or JBTM?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are CSW and JBTM both Industrials stocks?

Yes — both CSW Industrials, Inc. (CSW) and JBT Marel Corporation (JBTM) operate in the Industrials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this CSW vs JBTM comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

CSW Industrials

JBT Marel

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

CSW

CSW Industrials

Market cap

$4.39B

Sector

Industrials

JBTM

JBT Marel

Market cap

$6.75B

Sector

Industrials

Overall winner

CSW Industrials CSW

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	CSW	JBTM	Winner
Warren Buffett	68B	36D	CSW
Benjamin Graham	80A	42D	CSW
Philip Fisher	66B	50C	CSW
Peter Lynch	55C	57C	JBTM
Joel Greenblatt	46D	43D	CSW
Charlie Munger	59D	37D	CSW
Terry Smith	56D	28F	CSW

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CSW	JBTM
Market cap	$4.39B	$6.75B
P/E (TTM)	35.8x	43.5x
EV/EBIT	29.4x	46.8x
ROIC (TTM)	6.55%	3.3%
Gross margin	42.72%	35.34%
Net margin	12.64%	4.32%
Revenue CAGR 5y	8.82%	28.32%
EPS CAGR 5y	33.22%	-
Debt / Equity	0.7x	0.4x
Dividend yield	0.4%	0.29%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CSW leads on

Net margin12.64%vs 4.32%+66%
ROIC (TTM)6.55%vs 3.3%+50%
EV/EBIT29.4xvs 46.8x+37%
Dividend yield0.4%vs 0.29%+29%

JBTM leads on

Revenue CAGR 5y28.32%vs 8.82%+69%
Debt / Equity0.4xvs 0.7x+45%
Market cap$6.75Bvs $4.39B+35%

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

CSW Industrials

JBT Marel

Fit scores by strategy

Side-by-side metrics

Where each one wins

More like CSW

More like JBTM

Related on invest-like

Key terms in this analysis