Which is better, CUMMINSIND.NS or GPP.WA?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Cummins India Limited (CUMMINSIND.NS) currently grades higher than GPP.WA — 69/100 (B grade) vs 77/100 (B). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — CUMMINSIND.NS wins on Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, and Joel Greenblatt; GPP.WA wins on Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy CUMMINSIND.NS or GPP.WA?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both CUMMINSIND.NS and GPP.WA are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is CUMMINSIND.NS better than GPP.WA for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, CUMMINSIND.NS currently grades higher — 77/100 vs 69/100, a 8-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between CUMMINSIND.NS and GPP.WA on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). CUMMINSIND.NS currently scores 69/100 (B grade); GPP.WA scores 77/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, CUMMINSIND.NS or GPP.WA?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. CUMMINSIND.NS and GPP.WA are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, CUMMINSIND.NS or GPP.WA?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are CUMMINSIND.NS and GPP.WA both Industrials stocks?

Yes — both Cummins India Limited (CUMMINSIND.NS) and Grupa Pracuj S.A. (GPP.WA) operate in the Industrials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this CUMMINSIND.NS vs GPP.WA comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Cummins India Limited

CUMMINSIND.NS$1.55TIndustrials Market cap, Sector

Grupa Pracuj

GPP.WA$3.21BIndustrials Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Cummins India Limited

CUMMINSIND.NS 43 GPP.WA

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

CUMMINSIND.NS4wins

3winsGPP.WA

Warren Buffett

69C

B77

Benjamin Graham

89A

D58

Philip Fisher

79B

C69

Peter Lynch

82B

D45

Joel Greenblatt

70B

D56

Charlie Munger

75B

B77

Terry Smith

68C

B84

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CUMMINSIND.NS	GPP.WA
Market cap	Winner: $1.55T	$3.21B
P/E (TTM)	65.2x	13.3x Winner
EV/EBIT	49.6x	9.9x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	27.3%	39.1% Winner
Gross margin	35.83%	-
Net margin	19.76%	29.42% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 16.07%	10.06%
EPS CAGR 5y	Winner: 24.35%	12.96%
Debt / Equity	Winner: 0.0x	0.3x
Dividend yield	-	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CUMMINSIND.NS leads on

Market cap$1.55Tvs $3.21B+100%
Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.3x+99%
EPS CAGR 5y24.35%vs 12.96%+47%
Revenue CAGR 5y16.07%vs 10.06%+37%

GPP.WA leads on

EV/EBIT9.9xvs 49.6x+80%
P/E (TTM)13.3xvs 65.2x+80%
Net margin29.42%vs 19.76%+33%
ROIC (TTM)39.1%vs 27.3%+30%

More like CUMMINSIND.NS

CUMMINSIND.NS vs 6532.T CUMMINSIND.NS vs SALIK.AE CUMMINSIND.NS vs CTAS CUMMINSIND.NS vs RAA.DE

More like GPP.WA

GPP.WA vs 6532.T GPP.WA vs SALIK.AE GPP.WA vs CTAS GPP.WA vs RAA.DE

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for CUMMINSIND.NS Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for GPP.WA

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	CUMMINSIND.NS	GPP.WA
Market cap	Winner: $1.55T	$3.21B
P/E (TTM)	65.2x	13.3x Winner
EV/EBIT	49.6x	9.9x Winner
ROIC (TTM)	27.3%	39.1% Winner
Gross margin	35.83%	-
Net margin	19.76%	29.42% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 16.07%	10.06%
EPS CAGR 5y	Winner: 24.35%	12.96%
Debt / Equity	Winner: 0.0x	0.3x
Dividend yield	-	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

CUMMINSIND.NS leads on

Market cap$1.55Tvs $3.21B+100%
Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.3x+99%
EPS CAGR 5y24.35%vs 12.96%+47%
Revenue CAGR 5y16.07%vs 10.06%+37%

GPP.WA leads on

EV/EBIT9.9xvs 49.6x+80%
P/E (TTM)13.3xvs 65.2x+80%
Net margin29.42%vs 19.76%+33%
ROIC (TTM)39.1%vs 27.3%+30%