Which is better, ECLERX.NS or FTNT?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) currently grades higher than ECLERX.NS — 83/100 (A grade) vs 69/100 (B). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — ECLERX.NS wins on Benjamin Graham; FTNT wins on Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy ECLERX.NS or FTNT?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both ECLERX.NS and FTNT are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is ECLERX.NS better than FTNT for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, FTNT currently grades higher — 83/100 vs 69/100, a 14-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between ECLERX.NS and FTNT on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). ECLERX.NS currently scores 69/100 (B grade); FTNT scores 83/100 (A grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, ECLERX.NS or FTNT?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. ECLERX.NS and FTNT are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, ECLERX.NS or FTNT?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are ECLERX.NS and FTNT both Technology stocks?

Yes — both eClerx Services Limited (ECLERX.NS) and Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) operate in the Technology sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this ECLERX.NS vs FTNT comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

eClerx Services Limited

ECLERX.NS$129.02BTechnology Market cap, Sector

Fortinet

FTNT$108.43BTechnology Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Fortinet

ECLERX.NS 16 FTNT

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

ECLERX.NS1wins

6winsFTNT

Warren Buffett

69C

B83

Benjamin Graham

74B

B73

Philip Fisher

57D

A97

Peter Lynch

51D

B77

Joel Greenblatt

45D

B78

Charlie Munger

66C

B82

Terry Smith

69C

A88

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	ECLERX.NS	FTNT
Market cap	Winner: $129.02B	$108.43B
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 17.6x	51.8x
EV/EBIT	Winner: 12.4x	47.4x
ROIC (TTM)	24.88%	33.92% Winner
Gross margin	36.43%	80.67% Winner
Net margin	17.15%	27.49% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	15.84%	19.43% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	15.28%	34.75% Winner
Debt / Equity	Winner: 0.2x	0.5x
Dividend yield	-	0.0%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

ECLERX.NS leads on

EV/EBIT12.4xvs 47.4x+74%
Debt / Equity0.2xvs 0.5x+70%
P/E (TTM)17.6xvs 51.8x+66%
Market cap$129.02Bvs $108.43B+16%

FTNT leads on

EPS CAGR 5y34.75%vs 15.28%+56%
Gross margin80.67%vs 36.43%+55%
Net margin27.49%vs 17.15%+38%
ROIC (TTM)33.92%vs 24.88%+27%

More like ECLERX.NS

ECLERX.NS vs FICO ECLERX.NS vs CAMS.BO ECLERX.NS vs KLAC ECLERX.NS vs 4071.T

More like FTNT

FTNT vs FICO FTNT vs CAMS.BO FTNT vs KLAC FTNT vs 4071.T

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for ECLERX.NS Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for FTNT

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

eClerx Services Limited

ECLERX.NS$129.02BTechnology Market cap, Sector

Fortinet

FTNT$108.43BTechnology Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Fortinet

ECLERX.NS 16 FTNT

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

ECLERX.NS1wins

6winsFTNT

Warren Buffett

69C

B83

Benjamin Graham

74B

B73

Philip Fisher

57D

A97

Peter Lynch

51D

B77

Joel Greenblatt

45D

B78

Charlie Munger

66C

B82

Terry Smith

69C

A88

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	ECLERX.NS	FTNT
Market cap	Winner: $129.02B	$108.43B
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 17.6x	51.8x
EV/EBIT	Winner: 12.4x	47.4x
ROIC (TTM)	24.88%	33.92% Winner
Gross margin	36.43%	80.67% Winner
Net margin	17.15%	27.49% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	15.84%	19.43% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	15.28%	34.75% Winner
Debt / Equity	Winner: 0.2x	0.5x
Dividend yield	-	0.0%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

ECLERX.NS leads on

EV/EBIT12.4xvs 47.4x+74%
Debt / Equity0.2xvs 0.5x+70%
P/E (TTM)17.6xvs 51.8x+66%
Market cap$129.02Bvs $108.43B+16%

FTNT leads on

EPS CAGR 5y34.75%vs 15.28%+56%
Gross margin80.67%vs 36.43%+55%
Net margin27.49%vs 17.15%+38%
ROIC (TTM)33.92%vs 24.88%+27%

More like ECLERX.NS

ECLERX.NS vs FICO ECLERX.NS vs CAMS.BO ECLERX.NS vs KLAC ECLERX.NS vs 4071.T

More like FTNT

FTNT vs FICO FTNT vs CAMS.BO FTNT vs KLAC FTNT vs 4071.T

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for ECLERX.NS Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for FTNT

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.