Stock comparison
Black Stone Minerals, L.P.
Equinor ASA
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
BSM
Black Stone Minerals, L.P.
Market cap
$2.94B
Sector
Energy
EQNR
Equinor ASA
Market cap
$98.38B
Sector
Energy
Overall winner
Black Stone Minerals, L.P. BSM
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | BSM | EQNR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 51C | BSM |
| Benjamin Graham | 64C | 52C | BSM |
| Philip Fisher | 68D | 28F | BSM |
| Peter Lynch | 37D | 16F | BSM |
| Joel Greenblatt | 55C | 10F | BSM |
| Charlie Munger | 83A | 40D | BSM |
| Terry Smith | 84C | 41D | BSM |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | BSM | EQNR |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $2.94B | $98.38B |
| P/E (TTM) | 9.6x | 17.5x |
| EV/EBIT | 11.6x | 4.5x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 27.66% | 5.32% |
| Gross margin | 78.01% | 30.59% |
| Net margin | 63.48% | 5.27% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | -4.41% | 4.58% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 13.55% | -7.29% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.2x | 0.7x |
| Dividend yield | 8.97% | 4.06% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
BSM leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y13.55%vs -7.29%+154%
- Net margin63.48%vs 5.27%+92%
- ROIC (TTM)27.66%vs 5.32%+81%
- Debt / Equity0.2xvs 0.7x+76%
EQNR leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y4.58%vs -4.41%+196%
- Market cap$98.38Bvs $2.94B+97%
- EV/EBIT4.5xvs 11.6x+61%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.