Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Elastic N.V.
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$343.12B
Sector
Technology
ESTC
Elastic N.V.
Market cap
$5.67B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | ESTC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 32F | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 53D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 50C | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 54C | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 71B | ESTC |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 46D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 43D | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | ESTC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $343.12B | $5.67B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | - |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | - |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 60.86% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 75.97% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | -5.04% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 24.95% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.7x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Net margin29.31%vs -5.04%+117%
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$343.12Bvs $5.67B+98%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 0.7x+64%
ESTC leads on
- P/E (TTM)-vs 40.0x+163%
- EV/EBIT-vs 41.0x+144%
- Revenue CAGR 5y24.95%vs 5.31%+79%
- ROIC (TTM)60.86%vs 21.6%+65%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.