Stock comparison
Applied Materials
Fiserv
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$342.97B
Sector
Technology
FISV
Fiserv
Market cap
$30.46B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | FISV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 56D | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 39D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 59C | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 50C | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 29F | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 48D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 50D | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | FISV |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $342.97B | $30.46B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 9.1x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 10.1x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 7.31% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 58.07% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 15.17% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 6.9% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 33.27% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 1.1x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$342.97Bvs $30.46B+91%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 1.1x+76%
- ROIC (TTM)21.6%vs 7.31%+66%
FISV leads on
- P/E (TTM)9.1xvs 40.0x+77%
- EPS CAGR 5y33.27%vs 7.72%+77%
- EV/EBIT10.1xvs 41.0x+75%
- Revenue CAGR 5y6.9%vs 5.31%+23%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.