Which is better, FTI or USAC?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) currently grades higher than FTI — 69/100 (C grade) vs 45/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — FTI wins on Joel Greenblatt; USAC wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy FTI or USAC?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both FTI and USAC are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is FTI better than USAC for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, USAC currently grades higher — 69/100 vs 45/100, a 24-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between FTI and USAC on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). FTI currently scores 45/100 (D grade); USAC scores 69/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, FTI or USAC?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. FTI and USAC are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, FTI or USAC?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are FTI and USAC both Energy stocks?

Yes — both TechnipFMC plc (FTI) and USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) operate in the Energy sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this FTI vs USAC comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

TechnipFMC

USA Compression Partners, LP

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

FTI

TechnipFMC

Market cap

$28.3B

Sector

Energy

USAC

USA Compression Partners, LP

Market cap

$3.51B

Sector

Energy

Overall winner

USA Compression Partners, LP USAC

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	FTI	USAC	Winner
Warren Buffett	45D	69C	USAC
Benjamin Graham	49D	84A	USAC
Philip Fisher	46D	61C	USAC
Peter Lynch	47D	71C	USAC
Joel Greenblatt	61C	35D	FTI
Charlie Munger	36D	68D	USAC
Terry Smith	40D	64D	USAC

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	FTI	USAC
Market cap	$28.3B	$3.51B
P/E (TTM)	26.9x	32.8x
EV/EBIT	30.7x	20.6x
ROIC (TTM)	21.08%	8.89%
Gross margin	22.44%	51.61%
Net margin	10.63%	11.91%
Revenue CAGR 5y	11.6%	12.07%
EPS CAGR 5y	86.53%	-
Debt / Equity	0.4x	9.5x
Dividend yield	0.27%	7.08%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

FTI leads on

Debt / Equity0.4xvs 9.5x+96%
Market cap$28.3Bvs $3.51B+88%
ROIC (TTM)21.08%vs 8.89%+58%
P/E (TTM)26.9xvs 32.8x+18%

USAC leads on

Dividend yield7.08%vs 0.27%+96%
Gross margin51.61%vs 22.44%+57%
EV/EBIT20.6xvs 30.7x+33%
Net margin11.91%vs 10.63%+11%

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

TechnipFMC

USA Compression Partners, LP

Fit scores by strategy

Side-by-side metrics

Where each one wins

More like FTI

More like USAC

Related on invest-like

Key terms in this analysis