Stock comparison
Applied Materials
GoDaddy
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$342.97B
Sector
Technology
GDDY
GoDaddy
Market cap
$11.98B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | GDDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 67B | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 71B | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 68B | GDDY |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 61C | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 44D | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 66B | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 65B | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | GDDY |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $342.97B | $11.98B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 13.5x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 12.6x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 20.43% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 59.8% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 17.32% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 6.73% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 44.8% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 16.2x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Dividend yield0.45%vs 0.0%+100%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 16.2x+98%
- Market cap$342.97Bvs $11.98B+97%
- Net margin29.31%vs 17.32%+41%
GDDY leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y44.8%vs 7.72%+83%
- EV/EBIT12.6xvs 41.0x+69%
- P/E (TTM)13.5xvs 40.0x+66%
- Revenue CAGR 5y6.73%vs 5.31%+21%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.