Stock comparison
Applied Materials
CGI
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$342.97B
Sector
Technology
GIB
CGI
Market cap
$14.55B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | GIB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 56C | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 87A | 46D | AMAT |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 37D | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch | 65B | 39D | AMAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 66C | 31F | AMAT |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 41D | AMAT |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 43D | AMAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | GIB |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $342.97B | $14.55B |
| P/E (TTM) | 40.0x | 11.5x |
| EV/EBIT | 41.0x | 7.1x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.6% | 16.2% |
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 20.49% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 10.26% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.31% | 7.03% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 7.72% | 7.88% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.3x | 0.4x |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.73% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
AMAT leads on
- Market cap$342.97Bvs $14.55B+96%
- Net margin29.31%vs 10.26%+65%
- Gross margin48.96%vs 20.49%+58%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 0.4x+37%
GIB leads on
- EV/EBIT7.1xvs 41.0x+83%
- P/E (TTM)11.5xvs 40.0x+71%
- Dividend yield0.73%vs 0.45%+39%
- Revenue CAGR 5y7.03%vs 5.31%+24%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.