Which is better, GRGD.TO or WINA?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Groupe Dynamite Inc. (GRGD.TO) currently grades higher than WINA — 84/100 (A grade) vs 80/100 (A). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — GRGD.TO wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; WINA wins on none. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy GRGD.TO or WINA?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both GRGD.TO and WINA are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is GRGD.TO better than WINA for value investing?

The two are close on the headline Buffett-Fit score (84/100 vs 80/100), so "better for value investing" depends on which pillar you weight most. The five Buffett pillars + six other frameworks are broken down side-by-side on this page so you can pick the one that fits your style.

What's the difference between GRGD.TO and WINA on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). GRGD.TO currently scores 84/100 (A grade); WINA scores 80/100 (A grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, GRGD.TO or WINA?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. GRGD.TO and WINA are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, GRGD.TO or WINA?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are GRGD.TO and WINA both Consumer Cyclical stocks?

Yes — both Groupe Dynamite Inc. (GRGD.TO) and Winmark Corporation (WINA) operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this GRGD.TO vs WINA comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Groupe Dynamite

GRGD.TO$6.07BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector

Winmark

WINA$1.54BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Groupe Dynamite

GRGD.TO 70 WINA

Fit scores by strategy

GRGD.TO7wins

0winsWINA

Warren Buffett

84B

B80

Benjamin Graham

85A

B77

Philip Fisher

92A

C66

Peter Lynch

74B

C64

Joel Greenblatt

79B

C69

Charlie Munger

92A

D57

Terry Smith

90A

D58

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	GRGD.TO	WINA
Market cap	Winner: $6.07B	$1.54B
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 29.6x	31.6x
EV/EBIT	Winner: 20.6x	24.5x
ROIC (TTM)

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

GRGD.TO leads on

EPS CAGR 5y55.64%vs 1.92%+97%
Revenue CAGR 5y23.39%vs 2.42%+90%
Market cap$6.07Bvs $1.54B+75%
EV/EBIT20.6xvs 24.5x+16%

WINA leads on

More like GRGD.TO

GRGD.TO vs GAW.L GRGD.TO vs RMS.PA GRGD.TO vs 2059.TW GRGD.TO vs BKNG

More like WINA

WINA vs GAW.L

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Industries

Rankings

Glossary

Tools & Methodology

Groupe Dynamite

Winmark

Fit scores by strategy

Side-by-side metrics

Where each one wins

More like GRGD.TO

More like WINA

Related on invest-like

Key terms in this analysis