Which is better, GTT.PA or MPC?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Gaztransport & Technigaz SA (GTT.PA) currently grades higher than MPC — 72/100 (B grade) vs 42/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — GTT.PA wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; MPC wins on none. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy GTT.PA or MPC?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both GTT.PA and MPC are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is GTT.PA better than MPC for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, GTT.PA currently grades higher — 72/100 vs 42/100, a 30-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between GTT.PA and MPC on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). GTT.PA currently scores 72/100 (B grade); MPC scores 42/100 (D grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, GTT.PA or MPC?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. GTT.PA and MPC are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, GTT.PA or MPC?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are GTT.PA and MPC both Energy stocks?

Yes — both Gaztransport & Technigaz SA (GTT.PA) and Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) operate in the Energy sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this GTT.PA vs MPC comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Gaztransport & Technigaz SA

GTT.PA$7.03BEnergy Market cap, Sector

Marathon Petroleum

MPC$93.35BEnergy Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Gaztransport & Technigaz SA

GTT.PA 70 MPC

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

GTT.PA7wins

0winsMPC

Warren Buffett

72B

F42

Benjamin Graham

70B

C63

Philip Fisher

84B

F36

Peter Lynch

66C

F42

Joel Greenblatt

72B

F33

Charlie Munger

83B

F36

Terry Smith

88A

F41

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	GTT.PA	MPC
Market cap	$7.03B	$93.35B Winner
P/E (TTM)	18.0x	15.8x Winner
EV/EBIT	Winner: 13.8x	18.2x
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 54.72%	8.55%
Gross margin	Winner: 94.91%	8.8%
Net margin	Winner: 51.51%	3.41%
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 37.74%	2.55%
EPS CAGR 5y	47.56%	48.76% Winner
Debt / Equity	Winner: 0.2x	2.0x
Dividend yield	-	1.57%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

GTT.PA leads on

Net margin51.51%vs 3.41%+93%
Revenue CAGR 5y37.74%vs 2.55%+93%
Gross margin94.91%vs 8.8%+91%
Debt / Equity0.2xvs 2.0x+90%

MPC leads on

Market cap$93.35Bvs $7.03B+92%
P/E (TTM)15.8xvs 18.0x+12%

More like GTT.PA

GTT.PA vs BSM GTT.PA vs DMLP GTT.PA vs VAR.OL GTT.PA vs RATI.TA

More like MPC

MPC vs BSM MPC vs DMLP MPC vs VAR.OL MPC vs RATI.TA

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for GTT.PA Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for MPC

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Gaztransport & Technigaz SA

GTT.PA$7.03BEnergy Market cap, Sector

Marathon Petroleum

MPC$93.35BEnergy Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Gaztransport & Technigaz SA

GTT.PA 70 MPC

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

GTT.PA7wins

0winsMPC

Warren Buffett

72B

F42

Benjamin Graham

70B

C63

Philip Fisher

84B

F36

Peter Lynch

66C

F42

Joel Greenblatt

72B

F33

Charlie Munger

83B

F36

Terry Smith

88A

F41

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	GTT.PA	MPC
Market cap	$7.03B	$93.35B Winner
P/E (TTM)	18.0x	15.8x Winner
EV/EBIT	Winner: 13.8x	18.2x
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 54.72%	8.55%
Gross margin	Winner: 94.91%	8.8%
Net margin	Winner: 51.51%	3.41%
Revenue CAGR 5y	Winner: 37.74%	2.55%
EPS CAGR 5y	47.56%	48.76% Winner
Debt / Equity	Winner: 0.2x	2.0x
Dividend yield	-	1.57%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

GTT.PA leads on

Net margin51.51%vs 3.41%+93%
Revenue CAGR 5y37.74%vs 2.55%+93%
Gross margin94.91%vs 8.8%+91%
Debt / Equity0.2xvs 2.0x+90%

MPC leads on

Market cap$93.35Bvs $7.03B+92%
P/E (TTM)15.8xvs 18.0x+12%

More like GTT.PA

GTT.PA vs BSM GTT.PA vs DMLP GTT.PA vs VAR.OL GTT.PA vs RATI.TA

More like MPC

MPC vs BSM MPC vs DMLP MPC vs VAR.OL MPC vs RATI.TA

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for GTT.PA Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for MPC

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.