Which is better, GTT.PA or TPL?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) currently grades higher than GTT.PA — 81/100 (A grade) vs 72/100 (B). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — GTT.PA wins on none; TPL wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy GTT.PA or TPL?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both GTT.PA and TPL are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is GTT.PA better than TPL for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, TPL currently grades higher — 81/100 vs 72/100, a 9-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between GTT.PA and TPL on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). GTT.PA currently scores 72/100 (B grade); TPL scores 81/100 (A grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, GTT.PA or TPL?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. GTT.PA and TPL are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, GTT.PA or TPL?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are GTT.PA and TPL both Energy stocks?

Yes — both Gaztransport & Technigaz SA (GTT.PA) and Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) operate in the Energy sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this GTT.PA vs TPL comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Gaztransport & Technigaz SA

GTT.PA$6.8BEnergy Market cap, Sector

Texas Pacific Land

TPL$26.97BEnergy Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Texas Pacific Land

GTT.PA 07 TPL

Fit scores by strategy

GTT.PA0wins

7winsTPL

Warren Buffett

72B

B81

Benjamin Graham

70B

A91

Philip Fisher

84B

A89

Peter Lynch

66C

B80

Joel Greenblatt

72B

B75

Charlie Munger

83B

A92

Terry Smith

88A

A97

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	GTT.PA	TPL
Market cap	$6.8B	$26.97B Winner
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 18.0x	54.4x
EV/EBIT	Winner: 13.8x	45.8x
ROIC (TTM)

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

GTT.PA leads on

EV/EBIT13.8xvs 45.8x+70%
P/E (TTM)18.0xvs 54.4x+67%
EPS CAGR 5y47.56%vs 15.89%+67%
Revenue CAGR 5y37.74%vs 15.34%+59%

TPL leads on

More like GTT.PA

GTT.PA vs VAR.OL GTT.PA vs RATI.TA GTT.PA vs USAC GTT.PA vs COALINDIA.NS

More like TPL

TPL vs VAR.OL TPL vs RATI.TA

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Industries

Rankings

Glossary

Tools & Methodology

Gaztransport & Technigaz SA

Texas Pacific Land

Fit scores by strategy

Side-by-side metrics

Where each one wins

More like GTT.PA

More like TPL

Related on invest-like

Key terms in this analysis