Stock comparison
Halozyme Therapeutics
HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics
Market cap
$8.1B
Sector
Healthcare
HCM
HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Market cap
$2.09B
Sector
Healthcare
Overall winner
Halozyme Therapeutics HALO
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | HALO | HCM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 79B | 15F | HALO |
| Benjamin Graham | 83A | 35D | HALO |
| Philip Fisher | 65B | 18F | HALO |
| Peter Lynch | 53D | 31F | HALO |
| Joel Greenblatt | 40D | 35D | HALO |
| Charlie Munger | 80C | 14F | HALO |
| Terry Smith | 84A | 15F | HALO |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | HALO | HCM |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $8.1B | $2.09B |
| P/E (TTM) | 24.0x | 4.8x |
| EV/EBIT | 10.2x | - |
| ROIC (TTM) | 23.65% | -0.69% |
| Gross margin | 81.24% | 18.62% |
| Net margin | 23.13% | 104.77% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 33.23% | 11.48% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | -1.98% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 1.0x | 0.1x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
HALO leads on
- ROIC (TTM)23.65%vs -0.69%+103%
- Gross margin81.24%vs 18.62%+77%
- Market cap$8.1Bvs $2.09B+74%
- Revenue CAGR 5y33.23%vs 11.48%+65%
HCM leads on
- EV/EBIT-vs 10.2x+125%
- Debt / Equity0.1xvs 1.0x+92%
- P/E (TTM)4.8xvs 24.0x+80%
- Net margin104.77%vs 23.13%+78%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.