Which is better, IAG.L or RAA.DE?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, RATIONAL Aktiengesellschaft (RAA.DE) currently grades higher than IAG.L — 77/100 (B grade) vs 50/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — IAG.L wins on none; RAA.DE wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy IAG.L or RAA.DE?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both IAG.L and RAA.DE are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is IAG.L better than RAA.DE for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, RAA.DE currently grades higher — 77/100 vs 50/100, a 27-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between IAG.L and RAA.DE on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). IAG.L currently scores 50/100 (C grade); RAA.DE scores 77/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, IAG.L or RAA.DE?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. IAG.L and RAA.DE are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, IAG.L or RAA.DE?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are IAG.L and RAA.DE both Industrials stocks?

Yes — both International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A. (IAG.L) and RATIONAL Aktiengesellschaft (RAA.DE) operate in the Industrials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this IAG.L vs RAA.DE comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

International Consolidated Airlines Group

IAG.L$19.41BIndustrials Market cap, Sector

RATIONAL Aktiengesellschaft

RAA.DE$7.15BIndustrials Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

RATIONAL Aktiengesellschaft

IAG.L 07 RAA.DE

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

IAG.L0wins

7winsRAA.DE

Warren Buffett

50D

B77

Benjamin Graham

53D

B84

Philip Fisher

47D

B84

Peter Lynch

52D

C65

Joel Greenblatt

34F

C61

Charlie Munger

44F

B82

Terry Smith

42F

B81

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	IAG.L	RAA.DE
Market cap	Winner: $19.41B	$7.15B
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 5.7x	29.9x
EV/EBIT	Winner: 4.9x	22.5x
ROIC (TTM)	18.27%	25.86% Winner
Gross margin	25.19%	59.2% Winner
Net margin	10.06%	20.99% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	12.92%	15.25% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	Winner: 101.94%	26.53%
Debt / Equity	1.9x	0.0x Winner
Dividend yield	-	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

IAG.L leads on

P/E (TTM)5.7xvs 29.9x+81%
EV/EBIT4.9xvs 22.5x+78%
EPS CAGR 5y101.94%vs 26.53%+74%
Market cap$19.41Bvs $7.15B+63%

RAA.DE leads on

Debt / Equity0.0xvs 1.9x+98%
Gross margin59.2%vs 25.19%+57%
Net margin20.99%vs 10.06%+52%
ROIC (TTM)25.86%vs 18.27%+29%

More like IAG.L

IAG.L vs 6532.T IAG.L vs SALIK.AE IAG.L vs MYCR.ST IAG.L vs GPP.WA

More like RAA.DE

RAA.DE vs 6532.T RAA.DE vs SALIK.AE RAA.DE vs MYCR.ST RAA.DE vs GPP.WA

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for IAG.L Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for RAA.DE

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	IAG.L	RAA.DE
Market cap	Winner: $19.41B	$7.15B
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 5.7x	29.9x
EV/EBIT	Winner: 4.9x	22.5x
ROIC (TTM)	18.27%	25.86% Winner
Gross margin	25.19%	59.2% Winner
Net margin	10.06%	20.99% Winner
Revenue CAGR 5y	12.92%	15.25% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	Winner: 101.94%	26.53%
Debt / Equity	1.9x	0.0x Winner
Dividend yield	-	-

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

IAG.L leads on

P/E (TTM)5.7xvs 29.9x+81%
EV/EBIT4.9xvs 22.5x+78%
EPS CAGR 5y101.94%vs 26.53%+74%
Market cap$19.41Bvs $7.15B+63%

RAA.DE leads on

Debt / Equity0.0xvs 1.9x+98%
Gross margin59.2%vs 25.19%+57%
Net margin20.99%vs 10.06%+52%
ROIC (TTM)25.86%vs 18.27%+29%