Stock comparison
Installed Building Products
IBP$5.77BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector
Winmark
WINA$1.3BConsumer Discretionary Market cap, Sector
Overall winner
Winmark
IBP 16 WINA
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
Fit scores by strategy
IBP1wins
6winsWINA
63C
B80
83B
B77
53D
C66
54D
C64
39F
C69
54D
D57
55D
D58
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | IBP | WINA |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | Winner: $5.77B | $1.3B |
| P/E (TTM) | Winner: 22.4x | 31.6x |
| EV/EBIT | Winner: 16.6x | 24.5x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 14.25% | 2.43% Winner |
| Gross margin | 33.51% | 96.66% Winner |
| Net margin | 8.65% | 48.19% Winner |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | Winner: 10.83% | 2.42% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | Winner: 24.67% | 1.92% |
| Debt / Equity | 1.8x | - Winner |
| Dividend yield | 1.55% | 3.84% Winner |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
IBP leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y24.67%vs 1.92%+92%
- Revenue CAGR 5y10.83%vs 2.42%+78%
- Market cap$5.77Bvs $1.3B+77%
- EV/EBIT16.6xvs 24.5x+32%
WINA leads on
- Debt / Equity-vs 1.8x+176%
- ROIC (TTM)2.43%vs 14.25%+94%
- Net margin48.19%vs 8.65%+82%
- Gross margin96.66%vs 33.51%+65%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.