Which is better, GPP.WA or IESC?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Grupa Pracuj S.A. (GPP.WA) currently grades higher than IESC — 77/100 (B grade) vs 55/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — GPP.WA wins on Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; IESC wins on Benjamin Graham, Peter Lynch, and Joel Greenblatt. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy GPP.WA or IESC?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both GPP.WA and IESC are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is GPP.WA better than IESC for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, GPP.WA currently grades higher — 77/100 vs 55/100, a 22-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between GPP.WA and IESC on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). GPP.WA currently scores 77/100 (B grade); IESC scores 55/100 (C grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, GPP.WA or IESC?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. GPP.WA and IESC are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, GPP.WA or IESC?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are GPP.WA and IESC both Industrials stocks?

Yes — both Grupa Pracuj S.A. (GPP.WA) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) operate in the Industrials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this GPP.WA vs IESC comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Grupa Pracuj

GPP.WA$3.21BIndustrials Market cap, Sector

IES Holdings

IESC$12.91BIndustrials Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Grupa Pracuj

GPP.WA 43 IESC

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

GPP.WA4wins

3winsIESC

Warren Buffett

77B

D55

Benjamin Graham

58D

B74

Philip Fisher

69C

C61

Peter Lynch

45D

D57

Joel Greenblatt

56D

C68

Charlie Munger

77B

D55

Terry Smith

84B

D52

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	GPP.WA	IESC
Market cap	$3.21B	$12.91B Winner
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 13.3x	35.9x
EV/EBIT	Winner: 9.9x	35.7x
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 39.1%	27.3%
Gross margin	-	25.63%
Net margin	Winner: 29.42%	10.47%
Revenue CAGR 5y	10.06%	21.71% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	12.96%	47.56% Winner
Debt / Equity	0.3x	0.1x Winner
Dividend yield	-	0.0%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

GPP.WA leads on

EV/EBIT9.9xvs 35.7x+72%
Net margin29.42%vs 10.47%+64%
P/E (TTM)13.3xvs 35.9x+63%
ROIC (TTM)39.1%vs 27.3%+30%

IESC leads on

Market cap$12.91Bvs $3.21B+75%
EPS CAGR 5y47.56%vs 12.96%+73%
Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.3x+67%
Revenue CAGR 5y21.71%vs 10.06%+54%

More like GPP.WA

GPP.WA vs 6532.T GPP.WA vs SALIK.AE GPP.WA vs CTAS GPP.WA vs RAA.DE

More like IESC

IESC vs 6532.T IESC vs SALIK.AE IESC vs CTAS IESC vs RAA.DE

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for GPP.WA Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for IESC

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Grupa Pracuj

GPP.WA$3.21BIndustrials Market cap, Sector

IES Holdings

IESC$12.91BIndustrials Market cap, Sector

Overall winner

Grupa Pracuj

GPP.WA 43 IESC

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Fit scores by strategy

GPP.WA4wins

3winsIESC

Warren Buffett

77B

D55

Benjamin Graham

58D

B74

Philip Fisher

69C

C61

Peter Lynch

45D

D57

Joel Greenblatt

56D

C68

Charlie Munger

77B

D55

Terry Smith

84B

D52

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	GPP.WA	IESC
Market cap	$3.21B	$12.91B Winner
P/E (TTM)	Winner: 13.3x	35.9x
EV/EBIT	Winner: 9.9x	35.7x
ROIC (TTM)	Winner: 39.1%	27.3%
Gross margin	-	25.63%
Net margin	Winner: 29.42%	10.47%
Revenue CAGR 5y	10.06%	21.71% Winner
EPS CAGR 5y	12.96%	47.56% Winner
Debt / Equity	0.3x	0.1x Winner
Dividend yield	-	0.0%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

GPP.WA leads on

EV/EBIT9.9xvs 35.7x+72%
Net margin29.42%vs 10.47%+64%
P/E (TTM)13.3xvs 35.9x+63%
ROIC (TTM)39.1%vs 27.3%+30%

IESC leads on

Market cap$12.91Bvs $3.21B+75%
EPS CAGR 5y47.56%vs 12.96%+73%
Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.3x+67%
Revenue CAGR 5y21.71%vs 10.06%+54%

More like GPP.WA

GPP.WA vs 6532.T GPP.WA vs SALIK.AE GPP.WA vs CTAS GPP.WA vs RAA.DE

More like IESC

IESC vs 6532.T IESC vs SALIK.AE IESC vs CTAS IESC vs RAA.DE

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for GPP.WA Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for IESC

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.