Stock comparison
IHS Holding Limited
PLDT
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
IHS
IHS Holding Limited
Market cap
$2.82B
Sector
Communication Services
PHI
PLDT
Market cap
$4.08B
Sector
Communication Services
Overall winner
PLDT PHI
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | IHS | PHI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 51C | 58C | PHI |
| Benjamin Graham | 35D | 58C | PHI |
| Philip Fisher | 45D | 51C | PHI |
| Peter Lynch | 33F | 55C | PHI |
| Joel Greenblatt | 47D | 37D | IHS |
| Charlie Munger | 57D | 57D | Tie |
| Terry Smith | 54D | 48D | IHS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | IHS | PHI |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $2.82B | $4.08B |
| P/E (TTM) | 14.8x | 8.6x |
| EV/EBIT | 20.0x | 10.7x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 13.61% | 10.03% |
| Gross margin | 53.1% | 71.53% |
| Net margin | 11.96% | 13.6% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 0.04% | 3.82% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | - | 3.87% |
| Debt / Equity | - | 2.8x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 8.35% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
IHS leads on
- Debt / Equity-vs 2.8x+116%
- ROIC (TTM)13.61%vs 10.03%+26%
PHI leads on
- Dividend yield8.35%vs 0.0%+100%
- Revenue CAGR 5y3.82%vs 0.04%+99%
- EV/EBIT10.7xvs 20.0x+46%
- P/E (TTM)8.6xvs 14.8x+42%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.